For a long time, societies functioned as an innate magnitude of development. Inside these circles hides other shapes of improvement. The circular economy diagram, one of them, depends on the corners of the pyramid of civics and reformation in education. But, for a short time, a question mark entered this pyramid to reestablish the ideation and designation of a new system—a set of entities that interact together and represent three concrete corners. The pyramid depends solidly on civic engagement, maintains reformation in education, and completes with a circular economy on the top. Hence, the Anath foundation guides every individual from multiple backgrounds to involve and be at the center of this pyramid of change.
Besides dividing the goals of schools and educational systems, school models define the vision and reflect on the improvements needed. Schools as a word changed over the centuries. This modification acts as a responsive consideration to the constant changes in the needs of individuals and entities. In the beginning, schools had a basic sense of building discipline, reprimanding, and reproving. Later, the notion opened its walls to grasp new ways of communication, infinite lecture, and conceptual debate. But what remains after school years, as a residue in the students’ minds, is the way of reformations and simply where they are heading.
Starting with the scenario inside the school walls, the main questions arise as conducting an analysis occurs on the profound answers given to students. How is the mindset building happening, and what materials are provided to students? Despite answering these questions, a sitemap is essential and meaningful to figure out where society too is heading. And as initial are the reformations in the role of schools over the years, it is time to present a model that enables a circular economy as a complete social selection and reflection on past practices. It is an equal response to sustainability and reformation, which residue more often. And civic engagement happens to be one of the practical answers, which is the space outside school and acts as the genuine testimony of the innate circles of societies.
Educational systems correspond to two primary meanings, intermission of work and leisure for learning. Therefore, educational systems provide students the necessity to continue. But nowadays students can learn to invest in themselves. A circular economy demands a heterogeneous skill base, which applies as a conclusion of circular economy employment. This heterogeneity comes from the medley between civics engagement and school systems reformations. Through the ongoing learning of responsibilities and fellow rights, students can test themselves, their actions, ways, and realities. Reformations in school programs and materials can hint at the multitudes found in each student and which, if gathered, perform segments that contribute to the clarity of the pyramid.
If new materials, like advanced research, enter the reformed curriculums. Then, students acquire new skills that, to a certain extent, can help them adjust and adapt to the changes in society. Hence, students gain the role of learning from the community and try to practice it inside the school, unlike the notion that we grow upon, which directs students to schools as the primary establishment of knowledge. Research now, within civics engagement or without it, can stand as a tool to dwell within the expertise. By being aware of their responsibilities, individuals can grasp the ideation of sustainability and how the circular economy depends on it. New skills appear from research, and precisely when students start to learn and unlearn, they maintain the option to select what they want. Consequently, individuals engage with the notions of civics engagement that require heterogeneity, which fulfills the path toward sustainability.